1-year period
Sep 18, 2025 – Sep 18, 202612.27 ppdistribution contribution
+3.66% total − (-8.62% price) ≈ 12.27 pp
#11 of 100 eligible investments on these dates.
10 investments have a higher distribution contribution.
(11 − 1) ÷ (100 − 1)≈ 0.1010
Income Factory
JFR Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund
Included in Steve’s Personal Portfolio, dated Sep 1, 2026. Published weight priorities · 20-holding maximum · 1–10% limits. The plan uses a saved spreadsheet snapshot; later changes are not included. Source row 62. Published market-value weight: 4.06%. This sets its relative priority before the 1–10% limits. Borrower defaults and leverage. Falling base rates can reduce floating-rate income.
Income consistency rank#8100 eligible funds
The longer period is the weaker standing, setting a ranking score of 0.1778. Lower scores rank first.
Hypothetical investment
Growth of $10,000
Dividends reinvested · no additional contributions
JFR would be worth$13,1485-year growth · as of Sep 18, 2026
S&P 500 (SPY)$18,763Same $10,000 · same dates
Total gain / loss+$3,148+31.5% total return
JFRS&P 500 (SPY)
Sep 20, 2021 · $10,000 investedSep 18, 2026
Based on adjusted market prices through the latest available completed session, before personal taxes and trading costs.
Checking the latest completed session…
Market performance
Total return
Price movement plus reinvested distributions, compared with SPY.
+31.5% over 5 years
1 YEAR TOTAL RETURN+3.7%#11 income rank · 100 peers
Price-236% of return-8.6%
Dividend336% of return+12.3%
5 YEARS TOTAL RETURN+31.5%+5.6% / yr annualized#17 income rank · 91 peers
Price-78% of return-24.4%
Dividend178% of return+55.9%
Dividend includes all distributions and reinvestment.
Sep 20, 2021Sep 18, 2026
Total return+31.48%
S&P 500 (SPY)+87.63%
Annualized return+5.63%
Largest drawdown-20.40%
Transparent ranking calculation
Why JFR ranks #8
Income consistency · Compared with the active Income Factory collection through Sep 18, 2026.
5-year period
Sep 20, 2021 – Sep 18, 202655.88 ppdistribution contribution
+31.48% total − (-24.40% price) ≈ 55.88 pp
#17 of 91 eligible investments on these dates.
16 investments have a higher distribution contribution.
(17 − 1) ÷ (91 − 1)≈ 0.1778
Period score = (rank − 1) ÷ (eligible count − 1). This is the fraction of other eligible investments ahead of this one, from 0 (none ahead) to 1 (all ahead). It makes standings comparable when the two periods have different peer counts. A single eligible investment scores 0.
Use the weaker period
max(0.1010, 0.1778)≈ 0.1778
Lower scores come first. A stronger period cannot cancel a weaker one.
Add the two period scores
0.1010 + 0.1778≈ 0.2788
The lower combined score comes first when the weaker-period scores match.
JFR places #8 of 100
The longer period is the weaker standing, setting a ranking score of 0.1778. Lower scores rank first.
Remaining tie-breaks & return formula
Income Factory shares an overall rank when the weaker-period and combined scores match to eight decimal places. Within that shared rank, higher longer total-return rate, then higher recent total return, then ticker A–Z determine display order.
For JFR, the longer total-return tie-break is +5.6332% annualized; the recent total-return tie-break is +3.6555% cumulative.
Total return = 100 × (ending adjusted close ÷ starting adjusted close − 1). Price return = 100 × (ending split-adjusted close ÷ starting split-adjusted close − 1). Distribution contribution = total return − price return.
Annualized return = 100 × ((1 + total return ÷ 100)^(1 ÷ years) − 1), with years measured as elapsed days ÷ 365.2425. Histories under one year are never annualized. Peer returns are compared to eight decimal places; score sorting uses unrounded fractions. Numbers above are rounded for display.
Distribution contribution includes all provider-recorded distributions and reinvestment effects. “pp” means percentage points of the initial investment; this is not dividend yield, payout coverage or a forecast of income. Each investment is compared with eligible peers over its own exact dates, so peer counts can differ. No quality, valuation or risk factors are added to this calculation.
This explains the collection’s default ranking. Search, category filters and chart periods do not change it; choosing another sort changes the list order. This is Income Lens’s calculation, not a score published by the strategy creator.