1-year period
Sep 18, 2025 – Sep 18, 202619.78 ppdistribution contribution
-28.13% total − (-47.91% price) ≈ 19.78 pp
#2 of 100 eligible investments on these dates.
1 investment has a higher distribution contribution.
(2 − 1) ÷ (100 − 1)≈ 0.0101
Income Factory
OXLC Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
Included in Live CLO Experimental KISS & DRIP, dated Aug 27, 2026. Source position sizes · 20-holding maximum · 1–10% limits. The plan uses a saved spreadsheet snapshot; later changes are not included. Source row 11. Source position value: $2,659. This sets its relative priority before the 1–10% limits. Market losses, concentration, leverage where used, changing distributions and overlapping underlying investments.
Income consistency rank#33100 eligible funds
The longer period is the weaker standing, setting a ranking score of 0.4778. Lower scores rank first.
Hypothetical investment
Growth of $10,000
Dividends reinvested · no additional contributions
OXLC would be worth$7,3055-year growth · as of Sep 18, 2026
S&P 500 (SPY)$18,763Same $10,000 · same dates
Total gain / loss−$2,695-27.0% total return
OXLCS&P 500 (SPY)
Sep 20, 2021 · $10,000 investedSep 18, 2026
Based on adjusted market prices through the latest available completed session, before personal taxes and trading costs.
Checking the latest completed session…
Market performance
Total return
Price movement plus reinvested distributions, compared with SPY.
-27.0% over 5 years
1 YEAR TOTAL RETURN-28.1%#2 income rank · 100 peers
Price-47.9%
Dividend+19.8%
Net loss; shares not shown.
5 YEARS TOTAL RETURN-27.0%-6.1% / yr annualized#44 income rank · 91 peers
Price-74.5%
Dividend+47.5%
Net loss; shares not shown.
Dividend includes all distributions and reinvestment.
Sep 20, 2021Sep 18, 2026
Total return-26.95%
S&P 500 (SPY)+87.63%
Annualized return-6.09%
Largest drawdown-57.17%
Transparent ranking calculation
Why OXLC ranks #33
Income consistency · Compared with the active Income Factory collection through Sep 18, 2026.
5-year period
Sep 20, 2021 – Sep 18, 202647.52 ppdistribution contribution
-26.95% total − (-74.47% price) ≈ 47.52 pp
#44 of 91 eligible investments on these dates.
43 investments have a higher distribution contribution.
(44 − 1) ÷ (91 − 1)≈ 0.4778
Period score = (rank − 1) ÷ (eligible count − 1). This is the fraction of other eligible investments ahead of this one, from 0 (none ahead) to 1 (all ahead). It makes standings comparable when the two periods have different peer counts. A single eligible investment scores 0.
Use the weaker period
max(0.0101, 0.4778)≈ 0.4778
Lower scores come first. A stronger period cannot cancel a weaker one.
Add the two period scores
0.0101 + 0.4778≈ 0.4879
The lower combined score comes first when the weaker-period scores match.
OXLC places #33 of 100
The longer period is the weaker standing, setting a ranking score of 0.4778. Lower scores rank first.
Remaining tie-breaks & return formula
Income Factory shares an overall rank when the weaker-period and combined scores match to eight decimal places. Within that shared rank, higher longer total-return rate, then higher recent total return, then ticker A–Z determine display order.
For OXLC, the longer total-return tie-break is -6.0945% annualized; the recent total-return tie-break is -28.1314% cumulative.
Total return = 100 × (ending adjusted close ÷ starting adjusted close − 1). Price return = 100 × (ending split-adjusted close ÷ starting split-adjusted close − 1). Distribution contribution = total return − price return.
Annualized return = 100 × ((1 + total return ÷ 100)^(1 ÷ years) − 1), with years measured as elapsed days ÷ 365.2425. Histories under one year are never annualized. Peer returns are compared to eight decimal places; score sorting uses unrounded fractions. Numbers above are rounded for display.
Distribution contribution includes all provider-recorded distributions and reinvestment effects. “pp” means percentage points of the initial investment; this is not dividend yield, payout coverage or a forecast of income. Each investment is compared with eligible peers over its own exact dates, so peer counts can differ. No quality, valuation or risk factors are added to this calculation.
This explains the collection’s default ranking. Search, category filters and chart periods do not change it; choosing another sort changes the list order. This is Income Lens’s calculation, not a score published by the strategy creator.