Dividend FundBack to Nanalyze Dividend
Research reviewed September 20, 2026 · 100 investments

Durable businesses and rising dividends

Quantigence starts with demonstrated dividend growth, then compares the durability and growth potential of the businesses producing it.

Looking for the creator’s actual portfolio?

See what holdings they publish, subscription prices and whether the allocation can be replicated.

Portfolio access & pricing →

30 previously collected Nanalyze references plus 70 independent screen candidates: 49 additional NOBL holdings and 21 additional SDY holdings. The result is a research universe of 100 stocks, not Nanalyze’s proprietary portfolio or 100 companies verified against every Quantigence requirement.

The seven public factors

Nanalyze describes dividend-increase history, company size, international sales, current yield, five-year dividend growth, ten-year dividend growth and payout ratio. Its public framework begins with 25-year growers and removes smaller companies. The historical market-cap threshold in that article is not a current universal cutoff. The exact licensed inputs, current universe and official Q-scores require Nanalyze’s own data.

Nanalyze · Quantigence and its seven factors

Growth of income matters more than the largest yield

Nanalyze treats the dividend record as evidence of business durability. A large yield can reflect a falling share price, while slow increases can signal weakening prospects. Its public portfolio-construction guide also discusses upcoming champions with shorter records. We use that distinction to include a clearly labeled 20-year screening group, rather than imply every candidate has 25 standalone years.

Nanalyze · Dividend rules, upcoming champions and portfolio construction

How the 70 additions were selected

First, we added the 49 NOBL holdings not already in the section, using ProShares holdings dated September 18, 2026. The index targets S&P 500 companies with at least 25 consecutive annual dividend increases. Then we selected 21 additional names from State Street’s SDY holdings dated September 17, whose index targets at least 20 years. These add technology, services, insurance, utilities and royalty exposure.

ProShares · NOBL methodology and full holdings

A screening result is the start of research

Index membership does not verify the other Q-score inputs or guarantee that the next dividend will rise. SDY additions must be reviewed against the stricter 25-year rule; any candidate can fail current size, international-sales, growth or payout requirements. Kenvue has a short standalone history despite index treatment of predecessor history. REIT payout coverage should be examined using property cash-flow measures alongside ordinary earnings.

State Street · SDY methodology and full holdings

Diversify the business risks

The expanded universe covers consumer brands, healthcare, industrial services, technology, financials, utilities, materials, energy and property. Each added stock has a business rationale and a specific question to investigate. Sector coverage helps organize research; it does not make these companies equally attractive or justify buying all 100. We have not estimated future price targets or claimed a completed fundamental valuation.

How to interpret the ranking

The 20 existing Income Lens Q-score estimates remain assessed; the other 80 stocks are explicitly unassessed. No score is inferred from index membership or price returns. Unassessed stocks follow alphabetically in the default view, and all 100 are available in return sorts. The price-history comparison is separate from dividend-growth quality and cannot replace the missing fundamental inputs.

Primary sources

The 100-investment research universe

Every investment has a permanent page, source link and price history. The notes below distinguish existing creator references from independent additions. Research candidates are not buy recommendations or a claim about current fair value.

Research date is not the publication date of every source. Holdings, mandates and dividends can change. Historical returns do not establish future potential. Return and ranking methodology